Ontology:Q3352
Core characteristics[edit]
- label [string] (L)
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1 - historical Communist imagery as subculture
- alias (mis) [string]
- workers' states of the past have been flawed, but there is something to learn from them (Marxism)
- the Soviet Union had problems, but it made advancements (Marxism)
- alias (mis) [string]
- how dare you denounce the accomplishments of real-world socialisms (archaic Marxisms; Russian & United-States Identitarian fascism)
- historical Communist imagery as subculture rather than movement
- alias (mis) [string]
- we don't want to create the Soviet Union again; here is a quote from Lenin (Lacanianism / Existentialism, anarchism, Trotskyism)
- I'm not saying I want to create Bolshevism in the United States, but—...
- references [Item]1
-1-1 - Q3333 Soviet Union otaku
- color swatch references [Item]
- mainstream Marxism-Leninism
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- United States
- sub-case of [Item]
- [S] the trash I love anyway
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
Appearances[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- : forms result [Item]
- [S] Soviet Union otaku
- : forms result [Item]
- [S] Soviet Union otaku
Wavebuilder characterizations[edit]
- : route [Item]
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1 - forming from [Item]
- anime, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1 - historical materialism
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
- : route [Item]
- : route [Item]
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1 - forming from [Item]
- anime, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1 - Communists as stupid idiot garbage trash
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
-1-1
- Communism, the trash I love anyway1
Usage notes[edit]
This is the motif of presenting Communist movements as inherently, unavoidably existing within a context where they are a bad thing and not acceptable, but the speaker subjectively believes them to be okay. This motif may take place in many different contexts with many different small variations, but all of them have the connecting thread that the speaker does not appear to have any real material power to mobilize large numbers of people to change the public perception of Marxism and as a result is stuck awkwardly presenting facts which could be true but which are expected to land terribly.
This motif should be contrasted with situations such as a Marxist organization giving a lecture and confidently presenting the prospect of a workers' state as if there is no way it will not eventually happen.